Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2009-2012Notre Dame
WR • 6'3" • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
John Goodman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.4
Efficiency
92.2
Consistency
47.5
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Goodman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame. John Goodman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 159 primary output with 92.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 92.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
22.7
Efficiency
92.2
Usage
6.4
Consistency
47.5
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 10. Michigan State: 36. Miami: 13. Oklahoma: 0. Boston College: 18. Wake Forest: 59. USC: 23
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 1 by 66.7. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Miami: 1 by 86.7. Boston College: 1 by 100. Wake Forest: 2 by 100. USC: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 104 | 69.6 | 7.9 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Notre Dame | 146 | 57.9 | 10.1 | 42 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 146 | 57.9 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 65 | 61.7 | 5.8 | -81 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 159 | 92.2 | 6.4 | 94 |
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame
159 primary output · 92.2 efficiency · 6.4 usage
60.9
#2
2010 Postseason · Notre Dame
49.5
146 primary · 57.9 efficiency · 10.1 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Notre Dame
49.5
146 primary · 57.9 efficiency · 10.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.906
Bishop Dwenger · Fort Wayne, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
474
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
John Goodman quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit