Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2009-2012Ohio
TE • 6'4" • Rockford, OH, USA
Jordan Thompson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
72.5
Season Value
48.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Thompson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio. Jordan Thompson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Ohio paired 258 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
19
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
9.4
Consistency
72.5
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 11. New Mexico State: 29. Marshall: 9. Unknown: 19. Massachusetts: 27
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 1 by 73.3. New Mexico State: 2 by 96.7. Marshall: 1 by 60. Unknown: 2 by 63.3. Massachusetts: 2 by 90
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
96.7 vs New Mexico State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 109 | 86.7 | 7.3 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 204 | 62.6 | 16.4 | 95 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 204 | 62.6 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Ohio | 258 | 66.6 | 10.9 | 54 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 258 | 66.6 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 95 | 76.7 | 9.4 | -163 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Ohio
258 primary output · 66.6 efficiency · 10.9 usage
62.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
62.4
258 primary · 66.6 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Ohio
56.2
204 primary · 62.6 efficiency · 16.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
Parkway · Rockford, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
666
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Thompson quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit