Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2009-2010Troy
Tebiarus Gill
WR • 6'1" • Mobile, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tebiarus Gill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.5
Consistency
79.5
Season Value
66.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Troy
09091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Troy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tebiarus Gill, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Troy. Tebiarus Gill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Troy paired 578 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Troy
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.5
Efficiency
71.5
Usage
15.4
Consistency
79.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 80. Bowling Green: 68. Oklahoma State: 44. UAB: 45. Arkansas State: 13. Middle Tennessee: 31. Louisiana: 55. UL Monroe: 21. North Texas: 52. Florida International: 36. South Carolina: 46. Western Kentucky: 40. Florida Atlantic: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 6 by 75.6. Oklahoma State: 4 by 73.3. UAB: 3 by 100. Arkansas State: 2 by 43.3. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 41.3. Louisiana: 4 by 91.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 46.7. North Texas: 5 by 69.3. Florida International: 3 by 80. South Carolina: 4 by 76.7. Western Kentucky: 5 by 53.3. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 78.3
Split Comparison
Wins48.3 · n=8 · +9.9 vs Losses
Losses38.4 · n=5 · -9.9 vs Wins
First Half48 · n=7 · +7.7 vs Second Half
Second Half40.3 · n=6 · -7.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/19 | vs Ohio2+ TD | W 48-21 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 3 | 31 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 44-7 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Western Kentucky | W 28-14 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ South Carolina | L 24-69 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Florida International | L 35-52 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ North Texas | W 41-35 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ UL Monroe | L 14-28 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Louisiana | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Wed 10/6 | @ Middle Tennessee2+ TD | W 42-13 | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 2 | 9 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Arkansas State | W 35-28 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ UAB | L 33-34 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Oklahoma State | L 38-41 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Bowling Green | W 30-27 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Troy
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Troy | 581 | 76 | 14.7 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Troy | 581 | 76 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Troy | 578 | 71.5 | 15.4 | -3 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Troy | 578 | 71.5 | 15.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Troy
578 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 15.4 usage
66.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · Troy
66.6
578 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 15.4 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Troy
62.8
581 primary · 76 efficiency · 14.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8
Vigor · Mobile, AL
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,159
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.