Usage Score
16.4
Player Dossier
2009-2012Ohio
Bakari Bussey
WR • 6'2" • West Chester, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Bakari Bussey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
55
Consistency
64.2
Season Value
58.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Ohio
0909101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bakari Bussey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Ohio. Bakari Bussey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Ohio paired 313 primary output with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Ohio
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
26.1
Efficiency
55
Usage
16.4
Consistency
64.2
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 11. New Mexico State: 29. Marshall: 26. Unknown: 10. Massachusetts: 28. Buffalo: 77. Akron: 34. Miami (OH): 11. Eastern Michigan: 1. Bowling Green: 39. Ball State: 25. Kent State: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 3 by 24.4. New Mexico State: 3 by 64.4. Marshall: 2 by 86.7. Unknown: 2 by 33.3. Massachusetts: 2 by 93.3. Buffalo: 8 by 64.2. Akron: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 6.7. Bowling Green: 6 by 43.3. Ball State: 5 by 33.3. Kent State: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins29.4 · n=7 · +5.2 vs Losses
Losses24.3 · n=4 · -5.2 vs Wins
First Half30.2 · n=6 · +8.2 vs Second Half
Second Half22 · n=6 · -8.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | @ Kent State | L 6-28 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Ball State | L 27-52 | — | 5 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Thu 11/8 | vs Bowling Green | L 14-26 | — | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/1 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 45-14 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Miami (OH) | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Akron | W 34-28 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs BuffaloHigh volume | W 38-31 | — | 8 | 77 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Massachusetts | W 37-34 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Marshall | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New Mexico State | W 51-24 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Penn State | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Ohio | 16 | 35.5 | 6.6 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 16 | 35.5 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 107 | 98.3 | 13.7 | 91 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 112 | 56.9 | 8.7 | 5 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 313 | 55 | 16.4 | 201 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
35
Primary metric
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 64.2 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Ohio
313 primary output · 55 efficiency · 16.4 usage
58.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Ohio
56.6
107 primary · 98.3 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
39.5
112 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8389
Lakota West · West Chester, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
548
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.