Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011Toledo
Kenny Stafford
WR • 6'4" • Columbus, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kenny Stafford reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.1
Consistency
35.4
Season Value
48
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Toledo
080910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenny Stafford, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Toledo. Kenny Stafford reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Toledo paired 337 primary output with 82.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Toledo
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
26.4
Efficiency
65.1
Usage
8.6
Consistency
35.4
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 16. Unknown: 26. Ohio State: 7. Boise State: 4. Syracuse: 22. Eastern Michigan: 19. Bowling Green: 3. Miami (OH): 12. Northern Illinois: 64. Western Michigan: 91
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 86.7. Ohio State: 1 by 46.7. Boise State: 1 by 26.7. Syracuse: 3 by 48.9. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 42.2. Bowling Green: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 1 by 80. Northern Illinois: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins28.2 · n=5 · +3.9 vs Losses
Losses24.3 · n=4 · -3.9 vs Wins
First Half15 · n=5 · -22.8 vs Second Half
Second Half37.8 · n=5 · +22.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Air Force | W 42-41 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Western Michigan | W 66-63 | — | 3 | 91 | 30.3 | 30.30 | 0 | 75 |
| Tue 11/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 60-63 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Miami (OH) | W 49-28 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Bowling Green | W 28-21 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 54-16 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Syracuse | L 30-33 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Boise State | L 15-40 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 22-27 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Toledo | 75 | 66.7 | 5.8 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 222 | 70.6 | 7.9 | 147 |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 337 | 82.3 | 13.1 | 115 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 337 | 82.3 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Toledo | 264 | 65.1 | 8.6 | -73 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 264 | 65.1 | 8.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88
Primary metric
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Toledo
337 primary output · 82.3 efficiency · 13.1 usage
63
#2
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
63
337 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 13.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Toledo
48
264 primary · 65.1 efficiency · 8.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
St. Francis de Sales · Columbus, OH
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
898
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.