Usage Score
7.2
Player Dossier
2009-2012Toledo
David Pasquale
RB • 6'2" • Cape Coral, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
David Pasquale leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
35.4
Consistency
15.3
Season Value
39.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Toledo
0910111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Pasquale, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Toledo. David Pasquale leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Toledo paired 281 primary output with 35.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 35.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with 203 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Toledo
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
28.1
Efficiency
35.4
Usage
7.2
Consistency
15.3
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 26. Arizona: 6. Wyoming: 3. Unknown: 32. Western Michigan: 10. Central Michigan: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Ball State: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Akron: 203
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 8 by 31.3. Arizona: 2 by 31.3. Wyoming: 1 by 25. Unknown: 6 by 55.6. Western Michigan: 2 by 52.1. Central Michigan: 1 by 0. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 10.4. Akron: 22 by 77.2
Split Comparison
Wins43.4 · n=5 · +35.4 vs Losses
Losses8 · n=4 · -35.4 vs Wins
First Half15.4 · n=5 · -25.4 vs Second Half
Second Half40.8 · n=5 · +25.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
77.2 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | @ Utah State | L 15-41 | 6 | 17 | 2.80 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3.3 |
| Wed 11/21 | vs Akron150 scrimmage yards | W 35-23 | 15 | 93 | 6.20 | 0 | 7 | 110 | 9.2 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Northern Illinois | L 24-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/7 | vs Ball State | L 27-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 52-47 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Central Michigan | W 50-35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Western Michigan | W 37-17 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 32 | 5.30 | 0 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Wyoming | W 34-31 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Arizona | L 17-24 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 78 | 29.4 | 8.1 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 129 | 33.2 | 6.6 | 51 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 59 | 49.5 | 7.8 | -70 |
| 2012 Postseason | Toledo | 281 | 35.4 | 7.2 | 222 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 281 | 35.4 | 7.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with 203 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
203
Primary metric
203 scrimmage yards and 36.1 usage.
#2
Eastern Michigan
83
Primary metric
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 18.4 usage.
#3
Eastern Michigan
49
Primary metric
Win with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
#4
Eastern Michigan
44
Primary metric
Win with 44 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
44 scrimmage yards and 16.1 usage.
#5
Colorado
18
Primary metric
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 10.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Toledo
281 primary output · 35.4 efficiency · 7.2 usage
39.5
#2
2012 Regular Season · Toledo
39.5
281 primary · 35.4 efficiency · 7.2 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Toledo
35.4
59 primary · 49.5 efficiency · 7.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
Cape Coral · Cape Coral, FL
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
547
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.