Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Kent State
Matthew Hurdle
WR • 6'2" • Richmond, VA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Matthew Hurdle reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.3
Consistency
31.9
Season Value
51.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Kent State
0910111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matthew Hurdle, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Kent State. Matthew Hurdle reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Kent State paired 242 primary output with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Kent State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
57.3
Usage
17.8
Consistency
31.9
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 72. Unknown: 5. Kentucky: 27. Buffalo: 33. Ball State: 72. Eastern Michigan: 12. Army: 8. Western Michigan: 44. Rutgers: 15. Akron: 6. Miami (OH): 14. Bowling Green: 8. Ohio: 6. Northern Illinois: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 6 by 80. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Kentucky: 2 by 90. Buffalo: 3 by 73.3. Ball State: 5 by 96. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 40. Army: 1 by 53.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 58.7. Rutgers: 2 by 50. Akron: 1 by 40. Miami (OH): 1 by 93.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 17.8. Ohio: 1 by 40. Northern Illinois: 2 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins21.8 · n=10 · -14.9 vs Losses
Losses36.7 · n=3 · +14.9 vs Wins
First Half32.7 · n=7 · +17.9 vs Second Half
Second Half14.9 · n=7 · -17.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
96 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/7 | @ Arkansas State | L 13-17 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 37-44 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Ohio | W 28-6 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 2.70 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Miami (OH) | W 48-32 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Akron | W 35-24 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Rutgers | W 35-23 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Western Michigan | W 41-24 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Army | W 31-17 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 41-14 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ball State | W 45-43 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 28 |
| Wed 9/19 | @ Buffalo | W 23-7 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Kentucky | L 14-47 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Kent State | 19 | 31.1 | 9.4 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | -19 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kent State | 242 | 62.4 | 17.5 | 242 |
| 2012 Postseason | Kent State | 333 | 57.3 | 17.8 | 91 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kent State | 333 | 57.3 | 17.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas State
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 58.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Kent State
242 primary output · 62.4 efficiency · 17.5 usage
52.3
#2
2012 Postseason · Kent State
51.7
333 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Kent State
51.7
333 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7889
Highland Springs · Highland Springs, VA
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
594
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.