Usage Score
6.1
Player Dossier
2015-2017LSU
Donte Jackson
DB • 5'11" • 173 lbs • Metairie, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Donte Jackson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.8
Consistency
47
Season Value
28.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · LSU
1516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Donte Jackson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · LSU. Donte Jackson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
LSU paired 14.5 primary output with 28.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · LSU
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
28.8
Usage
6.1
Consistency
47
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. BYU: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Mississippi State: 0. Troy: 1. Florida: 1. Auburn: 4. Ole Miss: 0. Alabama: 1. Arkansas: 5. Tennessee: 0. Texas A&M: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 22.5. BYU: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 4 by 21.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 16.7. Troy: 5 by 30.8. Florida: 9 by 47.5. Auburn: 1 by 44.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 20.8. Alabama: 1 by 14.2. Arkansas: 7 by 79.2. Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. Texas A&M: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 7 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 6 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Notre Dame | L 17-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Texas A&M | W 45-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Tennessee | W 30-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs ArkansasSplash game | W 33-10 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | @ Alabama | L 10-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ole Miss | W 40-24 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Auburn | W 27-23 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Florida | W 17-16 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Troy | L 21-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Mississippi State | L 7-37 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs BYU | W 27-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | LSU | 1 | 2.2 | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | LSU | 10 | 21.9 | 3.2 | 9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | LSU | 10 | 21.9 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | LSU | 14.5 | 28.8 | 6.1 | 4.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | LSU | 14.5 | 28.8 | 6.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.5 takeover score.
#2
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.5 takeover score.
#4
Auburn
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
#5
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · LSU
14.5 primary output · 28.8 efficiency · 6.1 usage
28.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · LSU
28.3
14.5 primary · 28.8 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · LSU
27
10 primary · 21.9 efficiency · 3.2 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.976
Riverdale · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
87
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.