Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2015-2016Middle Tennessee
CB • 6'2" • New Orleans, LA, USA
Jeremy Cutrer shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.9
Efficiency
32.5
Consistency
50.9
Season Value
29.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Cutrer, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Jeremy Cutrer shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.5 disruption score.
Jeremy Cutrer played CB for Middle Tennessee. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jeremy Cutrer recorded 63 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 3 primary output with 30 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
32.5
Usage
5.9
Consistency
50.9
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 0. Unknown: 3. Vanderbilt: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. North Texas: 1.5. Western Kentucky: 1. Missouri: 1. Florida International: 0. UTSA: 1. Marshall: 1. Charlotte: 2.5. Florida Atlantic: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 2 by 38.3. Vanderbilt: 3 by 12.5. Bowling Green: 7 by 29.2. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 22.5. North Texas: 8 by 48.3. Western Kentucky: 5 by 30.8. Missouri: 1 by 14.2. Florida International: 4 by 16.7. UTSA: 6 by 35. Marshall: 5 by 30.8. Charlotte: 6 by 50. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 65
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
65 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/25 | vs Hawai'i | L 35-52 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Florida AtlanticSplash game | W 77-56 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Charlotte | W 38-31 | 6 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Marshall | L 17-42 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs UTSA | L 25-45 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Florida International | W 42-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Missouri | W 51-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Western Kentucky | L 43-44 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ North Texas | W 30-13 | 8 | 6 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 38-34 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 41-21 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Vanderbilt | L 24-47 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 3 | 30 | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 16 | 32.5 | 5.9 | 13 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 16 | 32.5 | 5.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#3
Charlotte
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 38.5 takeover score.
#5
Alabama
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
3 primary output · 30 efficiency · — usage
35.8
#2
2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
29.3
16 primary · 32.5 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
29.3
16 primary · 32.5 efficiency · 5.9 usage
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8226
Cy Ranch · Cypress, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
63
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.