Player Stats

Latavius Murray College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,948
Rushing yards
2,424
Receiving yards
524
Touchdowns
44

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonUCF71361324325.6
2009 Regular SeasonUCF00000-
2010 PostseasonUCF121041040151.1
2010 Regular SeasonUCF12580533471151.1
2011 Regular SeasonUCF127915492421050.6
2012 PostseasonUCF111047133382.1
2012 Regular SeasonUCF111,2331,0351981682.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

UCF paired 1,337 primary output with 59 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 59 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · UCF

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

121.5

Efficiency

59

Usage

38

Consistency

69.2

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 104. Akron: 111. East Carolina: 61. Southern Miss: 71. Memphis: 209. Marshall: 194. SMU: 196. UTEP: 129. Tulsa: 67. UAB: 105. Tulsa: 90

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 27 by 37.2. Akron: 15 by 79. East Carolina: 11 by 43.9. Southern Miss: 13 by 52.3. Memphis: 27 by 82.3. Marshall: 18 by 94.9. SMU: 25 by 74.8. UTEP: 26 by 52.5. Tulsa: 23 by 29.2. UAB: 16 by 66.5. Tulsa: 24 by 36.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins131.1 · Games = 9 · +52.6 vs Losses
Losses78.5 · Games = 2 · -52.6 vs Wins