Player Stats

Blake Hammond College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
613
Receptions
50
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan41380243
2010 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan49113343.9
2011 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan3334043.7
2012 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan925386470.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Western Michigan paired 386 primary output with 82 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 82 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Illinois

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Regular Season · Western Michigan

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

42.9

Efficiency

82

Usage

11.6

Consistency

60.3

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 23. Eastern Illinois: 94. Minnesota: 26. UConn: 9. Massachusetts: 8. Ball State: 39. Central Michigan: 75. Buffalo: 50. Eastern Michigan: 62

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 1 by 100. Eastern Illinois: 6 by 100. Minnesota: 3 by 57.8. UConn: 1 by 60. Massachusetts: 1 by 53.3. Ball State: 2 by 100. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 66.7. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins46.5 · Games = 4 · +6.5 vs Losses
Losses40 · Games = 5 · -6.5 vs Wins