Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2008-2008Tulane
—
Nathan Austin shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
3.7
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nathan Austin, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Tulane. Nathan Austin shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Tulane paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
3.7
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Army: 0. UTEP: 0. Rice: 0. LSU: 0. Houston: 2. UAB: 0. Tulsa: 0. Memphis: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
— vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Memphis | L 6-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 8 | 1.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Tulsa | L 7-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 23 | 1.90 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UAB | L 24-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 43 | 5.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Houston | L 14-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 39 | 1.80 | 2 | 11 |
| Sun 11/2 | @ LSU | L 10-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 53 | 3.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Rice | L 17-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 25 | 1.90 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ UTEP | L 21-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 61 | 10.20 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Alabama | L 6-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 2 | — | — | — |
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Memphis
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
Tulsa
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
UAB
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
LSU
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Tulane
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
51.9
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7444
Barbe · Lake Charles, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Nathan Austin quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit