Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Houston
Ronnie Williams
WR • 5'11" • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Ronnie Williams reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
47.4
Consistency
25.7
Season Value
46.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Houston
0910111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ronnie Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Houston. Ronnie Williams reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ronnie Williams played WR for Houston. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ronnie Williams recorded -3 rushing yards, 430 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Houston.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Houston paired 270 primary output with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Houston
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
24.5
Efficiency
47.4
Usage
11.6
Consistency
25.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 10. Louisiana Tech: 68. UCLA: 0. Rice: 6. North Texas: 0. UAB: 53. UTEP: 10. East Carolina: 8. Tulsa: 7. Marshall: 35. Tulane: 73
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 2 by 33.3. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 64.8. UCLA: 1 by 0. Rice: 1 by 40. UAB: 4 by 88.3. UTEP: 1 by 66.7. East Carolina: 2 by 26.7. Tulsa: 1 by 46.7. Marshall: 4 by 58.3. Tulane: 10 by 48.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins28.4 · Games = 5 · +7.1 vs Losses
Losses21.3 · Games = 6 · -7.1 vs Wins
First Half22.8 · Games = 6 · -3.8 vs Second Half
Second Half26.6 · Games = 5 · +3.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
88.3 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs TulaneHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 40-17 | — | 10 | 73 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Marshall | L 41-44 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Tulsa | L 7-41 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ East Carolina | L 28-48 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs UTEP | W 45-35 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs UAB | W 39-17 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs North Texas | W 44-21 | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Rice | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ UCLA | L 6-37 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 49-56 | — | 7 | 68 | 8.5 | 9.70 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs Texas State | L 13-30 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 16 | 53.4 | 3 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 6 | 20 | 3.6 | -10 |
| 2011 Postseason | Houston | 138 | 53.1 | 5 | 132 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Houston | 138 | 53.1 | 5 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 270 | 47.4 | 11.6 | 132 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 48.7 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 64.8 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Houston
270 primary output · 47.4 efficiency · 11.6 usage
46.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Houston
39.5
16 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 3 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Houston
35.9
138 primary · 53.1 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
Sterling · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
430
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.