Player Stats

Rashad Evans College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,321
Receptions
138
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonFresno State9128062.5
2008 Regular SeasonFresno State920204162.5
2009 Regular SeasonFresno State0-00-
2010 PostseasonFresno State10633179.4
2010 Regular SeasonFresno State1033391379.4
2011 Regular SeasonFresno State1344351359.4
2012 PostseasonFresno State9320057.5
2012 Regular SeasonFresno State931294657.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Fresno State paired 424 primary output with 69.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 59.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San Diego State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Fresno State

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

34.9

Efficiency

59.9

Usage

13.1

Consistency

52.2

Best Game by takeover score

San Diego State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. SMU: 20. San Diego State: 100. Colorado State: 16. Boise State: 37. Wyoming: 6. New Mexico: 28. Hawai'i: 8. Nevada: 51. Air Force: 48

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 3 by 44.4. San Diego State: 10 by 66.7. Colorado State: 4 by 26.7. Boise State: 5 by 49.3. Wyoming: 1 by 40. New Mexico: 2 by 93.3. Hawai'i: 1 by 53.3. Nevada: 4 by 85. Air Force: 4 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins36.7 · Games = 7 · +8.2 vs Losses
Losses28.5 · Games = 2 · -8.2 vs Wins