Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Fresno State paired 424 primary output with 69.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Fresno State | 9 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 62.5 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Fresno State | 9 | 20 | 204 | 1 | 62.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Postseason | Fresno State | 10 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 79.4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Fresno State | 10 | 33 | 391 | 3 | 79.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Fresno State | 13 | 44 | 351 | 3 | 59.4 |
| 2012 Postseason | Fresno State | 9 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 57.5 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Fresno State | 9 | 31 | 294 | 6 | 57.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Fresno State paired 424 primary output with 69.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San Diego State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
34.9
Efficiency
59.9
Usage
13.1
Consistency
52.2
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 20. San Diego State: 100. Colorado State: 16. Boise State: 37. Wyoming: 6. New Mexico: 28. Hawai'i: 8. Nevada: 51. Air Force: 48
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 3 by 44.4. San Diego State: 10 by 66.7. Colorado State: 4 by 26.7. Boise State: 5 by 49.3. Wyoming: 1 by 40. New Mexico: 2 by 93.3. Hawai'i: 1 by 53.3. Nevada: 4 by 85. Air Force: 4 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.