Usage Score
13.2
Player Dossier
2008-2012Utah State
TE • 6'2" • Blue Springs, MO, USA
Kellen Bartlett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.2
Efficiency
49.3
Consistency
67.1
Season Value
57.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kellen Bartlett, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Utah State. Kellen Bartlett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Utah State paired 272 primary output with 49.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 49.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
20.9
Efficiency
49.3
Usage
13.2
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 11. Unknown: 21. Utah: 47. Wisconsin: 5. Colorado State: 21. UNLV: 33. BYU: 23. San José State: 28. New Mexico State: 18. UTSA: 39. Texas State: 11. Louisiana Tech: 3. Idaho: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 2 by 70. Utah: 8 by 39.2. Wisconsin: 1 by 33.3. Colorado State: 3 by 46.7. UNLV: 3 by 73.3. BYU: 2 by 76.7. San José State: 3 by 62.2. New Mexico State: 4 by 30. UTSA: 5 by 52. Texas State: 3 by 24.4. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 20. Idaho: 2 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
76.7 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Toledo | W 41-15 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Idaho | W 45-9 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 48-41 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Texas State | W 38-7 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTSA | W 48-17 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs New Mexico State | W 41-7 | — | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ San José State | W 49-27 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ BYU | L 3-6 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs UNLV | W 35-13 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Colorado State | W 31-19 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-16 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs UtahHigh volume | W 27-20 | — | 8 | 47 | 5.9 | 5.90 | 1 | 11 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2008-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Utah State | 6 | 40 | 5.6 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Utah State | 81 | 55.2 | 7.9 | 75 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Utah State | 222 | 72.1 | 17.6 | 141 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah State | 0 | — | — | -222 |
| 2012 Postseason | Utah State | 272 | 49.3 | 13.2 | 272 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah State | 272 | 49.3 | 13.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121
Primary metric
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Fresno State
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 39.2 efficiency score.
#4
UNLV
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 52 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Utah State
272 primary output · 49.3 efficiency · 13.2 usage
57.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · Utah State
57.4
272 primary · 49.3 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Utah State
49.9
222 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 17.6 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7844
Blue Springs South · Blue Springs, MO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
581
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kellen Bartlett quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit