Player Stats

Kawaun Jakes College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
8,322
Passing yards
7,538
Rushing yards
784
Touchdowns
65

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky111,8711,5163551466.5
2010 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky121,8901,6802101459.4
2011 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky122,0151,8541611259.4
2012 PostseasonWestern Kentucky132001991265.4
2012 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky132,3462,289572365.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Western Kentucky paired 1,871 primary output with 53.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe

Loss with 313 yards of offense and 62.7 efficiency. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

195.8

Efficiency

58.4

Usage

13

Consistency

74.4

Best Game by takeover score

UL Monroe

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 200. Austin Peay: 317. Alabama: 159. Kentucky: 169. Southern Miss: 184. Arkansas State: 31. Troy: 246. UL Monroe: 313. Florida International: 124. Middle Tennessee: 297. Florida Atlantic: 201. Louisiana: 149. North Texas: 156

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 26 by 58.1. Austin Peay: 26 by 82.7. Alabama: 35 by 49.9. Kentucky: 30 by 56.6. Southern Miss: 22 by 69.1. Arkansas State: 9 by 57.3. Troy: 35 by 59.1. UL Monroe: 42 by 62.7. Florida International: 29 by 49.6. Middle Tennessee: 35 by 64.2. Florida Atlantic: 32 by 53.8. Louisiana: 26 by 50.6. North Texas: 31 by 46

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins175.3 · Games = 7 · -44.5 vs Losses
Losses219.8 · Games = 6 · +44.5 vs Wins