Player Dossier

2008-2012

Kent State

Eric Adeyemi

WR • 6'0" • Miami, FL, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Eric Adeyemi reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

16.3

Efficiency

64.1

Consistency

25.4

Season Value

50.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Kent State

08080910111212

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Kentucky • Kent State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Eric Adeyemi, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Kent State. Eric Adeyemi reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Eric Adeyemi played WR for Kentucky and Kent State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Eric Adeyemi recorded 12 rushing yards, 433 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Kent State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Kent State paired 242 primary output with 64.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 64.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Kent State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Kent State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

18.6

Efficiency

64.1

Usage

16.3

Consistency

25.4

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 4. Kentucky: 17. Buffalo: 0. Ball State: 7. Eastern Michigan: 0. Army: 46. Western Michigan: 40. Rutgers: 9. Akron: 6. Miami (OH): 0. Bowling Green: 39. Ohio: 74. Northern Illinois: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 26.7. Kentucky: 2 by 56.7. Ball State: 1 by 46.7. Army: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 4 by 66.7. Rutgers: 1 by 60. Akron: 2 by 20. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Ohio: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins22.1 · Games = 10 · +15.1 vs Losses
Losses7 · Games = 3 · -15.1 vs Wins
First Half16.3 · Games = 7 · -5.0 vs Second Half
Second Half21.3 · Games = 6 · +5.0 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Ohio

Best efficiency game

100 vs Ohio

Result
Mon 1/7@ Arkansas StateL 13-17144404
Sat 12/1vs Northern IllinoisL 37-44
Fri 11/23vs OhioW 28-637424.724.70144
Sat 11/17@ Bowling GreenW 31-2423919.519.50132
Sat 11/10@ Miami (OH)W 48-327
Sat 11/3vs AkronW 35-24263305
Sat 10/27@ RutgersW 35-23199909
Sat 10/20vs Western MichiganW 41-244401010014
Sat 10/13@ ArmyW 31-172462323130
Sat 10/6@ Eastern MichiganW 41-14
Sat 9/29vs Ball StateW 45-43177707
Wed 9/19@ BuffaloW 23-7
Sat 9/8@ KentuckyL 14-472178.58.50011

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Kentucky

    2008-2009

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Kent State

    2010-2012

    Final stop

Season Progression

2008200820092010201120122012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2008 PostseasonKentucky10854.88.8
2008 Regular SeasonKentucky10854.88.80
2009 Regular SeasonKentucky4145.28.6-67
2010 Regular SeasonKent State0-41
2011 Regular SeasonKent State4245.87.842
2012 PostseasonKent State24264.116.3200
2012 Regular SeasonKent State24264.116.30

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Ohio

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

74

Primary metric

74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

East Carolina

31

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Louisiana

29

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.

#4

Army

46

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Unknown

31

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2012 Postseason · Kent State

242 primary output · 64.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage

50.7

#2

2012 Regular Season · Kent State

50.7

242 primary · 64.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage

#3

2008 Postseason · Kentucky

41

108 primary · 54.8 efficiency · 8.8 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2008 · Rating 0.7222

Miami Southridge · Miami, FL

Committed To
Kentucky
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2008

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

433

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.