Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2008-2010Auburn
Derek Winter
WR • 6'0" • Tampa, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Derek Winter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
95.6
Consistency
97.2
Season Value
74.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Auburn
080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Derek Winter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Auburn. Derek Winter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Auburn paired 44 primary output with 95.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 95.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Auburn
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
14.7
Efficiency
95.6
Usage
6.9
Consistency
97.2
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 13. UL Monroe: 15. South Carolina: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 86.7. UL Monroe: 1 by 100. South Carolina: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins14.7 · n=3
First Half14 · n=2
All Games14.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Auburn | 27 | 40 | 12.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Auburn | 16 | 100 | 3.7 | -11 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Auburn | 44 | 95.6 | 6.9 | 28 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16
Primary metric
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
16
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas State
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Auburn
44 primary output · 95.6 efficiency · 6.9 usage
74.4
#2
2009 Regular Season · Auburn
59.8
16 primary · 100 efficiency · 3.7 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Auburn
38.1
27 primary · 40 efficiency · 12.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8156
Plant · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
87
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.