Usage Score
11.2
Player Dossier
2009-2011Auburn
Barrett Trotter
QB • 6'2" • Birmingham, AL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Barrett Trotter is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
54.2
Consistency
72.2
Season Value
59.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Auburn
09101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Barrett Trotter, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Auburn. Barrett Trotter is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Barrett Trotter played QB for Auburn. Across 3 tracked seasons, Barrett Trotter recorded 1,248 passing yards, 130 rushing yards, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Auburn.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Auburn paired 1,246 primary output with 54.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 54.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with 252 yards of offense and 67.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Auburn
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
155.8
Efficiency
54.2
Usage
11.2
Consistency
72.2
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia: 207. Utah State: 252. Mississippi State: 149. Clemson: 212. Florida Atlantic: 203. South Carolina: 111. Arkansas: 85. Florida: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia: 23 by 76.5. Utah State: 28 by 67.1. Mississippi State: 27 by 53.1. Clemson: 29 by 58.3. Florida Atlantic: 35 by 57.9. South Carolina: 31 by 39.5. Arkansas: 21 by 41.5. Florida: 9 by 39.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins158.2 · Games = 6 · +9.7 vs Losses
Losses148.5 · Games = 2 · -9.7 vs Wins
First Half205 · Games = 4 · +98.5 vs Second Half
Second Half106.5 · Games = 4 · -98.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
76.5 vs Virginia
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/1 | vs Virginia | W 43-24 | 11 | 18 | 175 | 61.1 | 1 | 0 | 76.5 | 5 | 32 | 6.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Florida | W 17-6 | 2 | 8 | 33 | 25.0 | 1 | 0 | 39.8 | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Arkansas | L 14-38 | 6 | 19 | 81 | 31.6 | 0 | 1 | 41.5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ South Carolina | W 16-13 | 12 | 23 | 112 | 52.2 | 1 | 2 | 39.5 | 8 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 30-14 | 16 | 28 | 178 | 57.1 | 2 | 1 | 57.9 | 7 | 25 | 3.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Clemson | L 24-38 | 12 | 25 | 198 | 48.0 | 1 | 1 | 58.3 | 4 | 14 | 3.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Mississippi State | W 41-34 | 16 | 23 | 146 | 69.6 | 2 | 1 | 53.1 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Utah State3+ TD | W 42-38 | 17 | 23 | 261 | 73.9 | 3 | 0 | 67.1 | 5 | -9 | -1.80 | 0 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Auburn | 132 | 71.5 | 4.4 | 132 |
| 2011 Postseason | Auburn | 1,246 | 54.2 | 11.2 | 1,114 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Auburn | 1,246 | 54.2 | 11.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with 53 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
53
Primary metric
53 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas State
13
Primary metric
Win with 13 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
13 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Utah State
252
Primary metric
Win with 252 yards of offense and 67.1 efficiency.
252 total offense with 67.1 efficiency.
#4
UL Monroe
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards of offense and 76.3 efficiency.
56 total offense with 76.3 efficiency.
#5
Virginia
207
Primary metric
Win with 207 yards of offense and 76.5 efficiency.
207 total offense with 76.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Auburn
1,246 primary output · 54.2 efficiency · 11.2 usage
59.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Auburn
59.4
1,246 primary · 54.2 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Auburn
30.6
132 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 4.4 usage
Milestones
1
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
6
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8433
Briarwood Christian · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,378
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.