Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
West Virginia paired 226 primary output with 84.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | West Virginia | 3 | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 53.2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | West Virginia | 3 | 37 | 0 | 37 | 2 | 53.2 |
| 2009 Postseason | West Virginia | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.2 |
| 2009 Regular Season | West Virginia | 10 | 117 | 0 | 117 | 1 | 37.2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | West Virginia | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 24.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | West Virginia | 11 | 226 | 0 | 226 | 2 | 65.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
West Virginia paired 226 primary output with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with 41 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
20.5
Efficiency
84.7
Usage
3.2
Consistency
68.4
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 8. Norfolk State: 20. Maryland: 3. LSU: 33. Bowling Green: 14. UConn: 25. Rutgers: 29. Louisville: 18. Cincinnati: 19. Pittsburgh: 41. South Florida: 16
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 1 by 66.7. Norfolk State: 2 by 83.3. Maryland: 1 by 25. LSU: 3 by 91.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. UConn: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Louisville: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 79.2. Pittsburgh: 4 by 85.4. South Florida: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.