Player Stats

Tino Sunseri College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
8,591
Passing yards
8,590
Rushing yards
1
Touchdowns
56

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonPittsburgh4112114-2227.5
2010 PostseasonPittsburgh131499653261.6
2010 Regular SeasonPittsburgh132,5312,476551661.6
2011 PostseasonPittsburgh13150183-33070.5
2011 Regular SeasonPittsburgh132,5522,4331191470.5
2012 PostseasonPittsburgh13169185-16268
2012 Regular SeasonPittsburgh132,9283,103-1752068

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason

Pittsburgh paired 2,702 primary output with 55 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse

Loss with 286 yards of offense and 64.1 efficiency. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

238.2

Efficiency

58.9

Usage

14.6

Consistency

80.5

Best Game by takeover score

Syracuse

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 169. Youngstown State: 256. Cincinnati: 247. Virginia Tech: 279. Gardner-Webb: 340. Syracuse: 286. Louisville: 277. Buffalo: 131. Temple: 313. Notre Dame: 134. UConn: 286. Rutgers: 209. South Florida: 170

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 38 by 46.4. Youngstown State: 34 by 68.1. Cincinnati: 45 by 54.2. Virginia Tech: 31 by 59.4. Gardner-Webb: 26 by 68.8. Syracuse: 42 by 64.1. Louisville: 45 by 60.1. Buffalo: 23 by 55.2. Temple: 30 by 66.7. Notre Dame: 37 by 53.2. UConn: 38 by 57.5. Rutgers: 42 by 50.6. South Florida: 30 by 61.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins240.3 · Games = 6 · +3.9 vs Losses
Losses236.4 · Games = 7 · -3.9 vs Wins