Usage Score
35.4
Player Dossier
2008-2012New Mexico
Lamaar Thomas
WR • 5'11" • Ft. Washington, MD, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Lamaar Thomas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.2
Consistency
39.1
Season Value
45.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · New Mexico
0809101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio State • New Mexico
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lamaar Thomas, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · New Mexico. Lamaar Thomas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
New Mexico paired 156 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, New Mexico.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · New Mexico
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
15
Efficiency
64.2
Usage
35.4
Consistency
39.1
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 10. Texas: 0. New Mexico State: 31. Boise State: 23. Texas State: 9. Hawai'i: 0. Air Force: 0. Fresno State: 19. UNLV: 38. Nevada: 0. Colorado State: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. New Mexico State: 4 by 51.7. Boise State: 2 by 76.7. Texas State: 1 by 60. Hawai'i: 1 by 0. Fresno State: 1 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 100. Colorado State: 4 by 58.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins13.3 · Games = 3 · -3.1 vs Losses
Losses16.4 · Games = 7 · +3.1 vs Wins
First Half12.2 · Games = 6 · -6.2 vs Second Half
Second Half18.4 · Games = 5 · +6.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | @ Colorado State | L 20-24 | — | 4 | 35 | 5.9 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Nevada | L 24-31 | — | — | — | 21.7 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ UNLV | L 7-35 | — | 1 | 38 | 10 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Fresno State | L 32-49 | — | 1 | 19 | 6.5 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Air Force | L 23-28 | — | — | — | 5.3 | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/14 | @ Hawai'i | W 35-23 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Texas State | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Boise State | L 29-32 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.8 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ New Mexico State | W 27-14 | — | 4 | 31 | 5.4 | 7.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Texas | L 0-45 | — | — | — | 16 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 10 | 12.5 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2008-2009
Opening stop
- 2
New Mexico
2010-2012
Final stop
Season Progression
20082009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio State | 29 | 57.8 | 10.1 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio State | 10 | 66.7 | 5.9 | -19 |
| 2010 Regular Season | New Mexico | 0 | — | — | -10 |
| 2011 Regular Season | New Mexico | 156 | 93.3 | 13.9 | 156 |
| 2012 Regular Season | New Mexico | 165 | 64.2 | 35.4 | 9 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38
Primary metric
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Purdue
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado State
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 58.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · New Mexico
156 primary output · 93.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage
54.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · New Mexico
45.3
165 primary · 64.2 efficiency · 35.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Ohio State
36.2
29 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9482
Friendly · Fort Washington, MD
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
360
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.