Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
San José State paired 1,181 primary output with 49.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Minnesota | 13 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 61.9 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Minnesota | 13 | 833 | 652 | 181 | 7 | 61.9 |
| 2009 Postseason | Minnesota | 9 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 46.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 9 | 269 | 251 | 18 | 3 | 46.5 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 12 | 735 | 698 | 37 | 7 | 64 |
| 2012 Postseason | San José State | 13 | 39 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 74.8 |
| 2012 Regular Season | San José State | 13 | 1,142 | 992 | 150 | 10 | 74.8 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
San José State paired 1,181 primary output with 49.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Minnesota, San José State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
90.8
Efficiency
49.6
Usage
30.7
Consistency
62.1
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 39. Stanford: 32. UC Davis: 130. Colorado State: 86. San Diego State: 77. Navy: 96. Utah State: 77. UTSA: 39. Texas State: 175. Idaho: 49. New Mexico State: 116. BYU: 46. Louisiana Tech: 219
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 16 by 26. Stanford: 14 by 26. UC Davis: 17 by 81.9. Colorado State: 21 by 42.7. San Diego State: 14 by 52.5. Navy: 23 by 36.8. Utah State: 18 by 43.7. UTSA: 11 by 38.5. Texas State: 29 by 58.6. Idaho: 17 by 30.4. New Mexico State: 8 by 100. BYU: 17 by 28.2. Louisiana Tech: 30 by 78.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.