Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Kansas State paired 191 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Minnesota | 4 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 27.9 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | Kansas State | 4 | 14 | 191 | 3 | 80 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Kansas State paired 191 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Minnesota, Kansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
47.8
Efficiency
67.8
Usage
31.2
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 14. Missouri State: 99. Iowa State: 66. UCF: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 3 by 31.1. Missouri State: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 3 by 100. UCF: 2 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.