Usage Score
25.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011Michigan State
Keshawn Martin
WR • 5'11" • Inkster, MI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Keshawn Martin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.2
Consistency
64.8
Season Value
62.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan State
0808090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keshawn Martin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan State. Keshawn Martin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Michigan State paired 777 primary output with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
74.2
Usage
25.6
Consistency
64.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 35. Unknown: 28. Florida Atlantic: 72. Notre Dame: 32. Central Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 45. Michigan: 31. Wisconsin: 41. Nebraska: 58. Minnesota: 77. Iowa: 87. Indiana: 99. Northwestern: 57. Wisconsin: 115
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 58.3. Unknown: 2 by 93.3. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 68.6. Notre Dame: 5 by 42.7. Ohio State: 5 by 60. Michigan: 3 by 68.9. Wisconsin: 5 by 54.7. Nebraska: 5 by 77.3. Minnesota: 7 by 73.3. Iowa: 4 by 100. Indiana: 8 by 82.5. Northwestern: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 9 by 85.2
Split Comparison
Wins54.4 · n=10 · -13.9 vs Losses
Losses68.3 · n=3 · +13.9 vs Wins
First Half34.7 · n=7 · -41.6 vs Second Half
Second Half76.3 · n=7 · +41.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 33-30 | — | 4 | 35 | 4.5 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 12/4 | vs Wisconsin100 receiving yards · High volume | L 39-42 | — | 9 | 115 | 10.1 | 12.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Northwestern | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 57 | 21.7 | 28.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs IndianaHigh volume | W 55-3 | — | 8 | 99 | 13.1 | 12.40 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Iowa | W 37-21 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Minnesota | W 31-24 | — | 7 | 77 | 9.8 | 11 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Nebraska | L 3-24 | — | 5 | 58 | 9 | 11.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Wisconsin | W 37-31 | — | 5 | 41 | 12.5 | 8.20 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Michigan2+ TD | W 28-14 | — | 3 | 31 | 8.5 | 10.30 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ohio State | W 10-7 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Central Michigan | W 45-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Notre Dame | L 13-31 | — | 5 | 32 | 4.8 | 6.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 44-0 | — | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 39 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 28 | 9.8 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Michigan State | 132 | 66.6 | 11.1 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan State | 132 | 66.6 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Michigan State | 411 | 86.7 | 11 | 279 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 411 | 86.7 | 11 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan State | 394 | 75.1 | 16.9 | -17 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 394 | 75.1 | 16.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan State | 777 | 74.2 | 25.6 | 383 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 777 | 74.2 | 25.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 85.2 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
139
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Michigan State
777 primary output · 74.2 efficiency · 25.6 usage
62.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · Michigan State
62.8
777 primary · 74.2 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Michigan State
49.5
394 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 16.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.77
Squalicum · Bellingham, WA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,714
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.