Player Stats

Glenn Winston College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
210
Rushing yards
204
Receiving yards
6
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonMichigan State2000020.1
2009 Regular SeasonMichigan State62102046262.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Michigan State paired 210 primary output with 37.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 37.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Illinois

Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Michigan State

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

35

Efficiency

37.7

Usage

17.8

Consistency

61.9

Best Game by takeover score

Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Montana State: 24. Central Michigan: 3. Notre Dame: 14. Wisconsin: 52. Michigan: 53. Illinois: 64

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Montana State: 4 by 62.5. Central Michigan: 3 by 10.4. Notre Dame: 6 by 24.3. Wisconsin: 9 by 60.2. Michigan: 25 by 21.1. Illinois: 14 by 47.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins47 · Games = 3 · +24 vs Losses
Losses23 · Games = 3 · -24 vs Wins