Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Kansas State paired 3,561 primary output with 68.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Kansas State | 5 | 19 | 27 | -8 | 1 | 15.4 |
| 2010 Postseason | Kansas State | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 37.5 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Kansas State | 10 | 568 | 138 | 430 | 7 | 37.5 |
| 2011 Postseason | Kansas State | 13 | 215 | 173 | 42 | 2 | 81.7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas State | 13 | 2,844 | 1,745 | 1,099 | 38 | 81.7 |
| 2012 Postseason | Kansas State | 13 | 181 | 151 | 30 | 2 | 86.5 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas State | 13 | 3,380 | 2,490 | 890 | 37 | 86.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Kansas State paired 3,561 primary output with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
273.9
Efficiency
68.7
Usage
40
Consistency
88.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 181. Missouri State: 223. Miami: 281. North Texas: 315. Oklahoma: 228. Kansas: 245. Iowa State: 292. West Virginia: 364. Texas Tech: 316. Oklahoma State: 309. TCU: 195. Baylor: 325. Texas: 287
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 45 by 47.6. Missouri State: 41 by 64.9. Miami: 33 by 69.4. North Texas: 31 by 82. Oklahoma: 38 by 66.9. Kansas: 24 by 81.7. Iowa State: 49 by 68.4. West Virginia: 33 by 81.2. Texas Tech: 38 by 79.2. Oklahoma State: 39 by 75.8. TCU: 36 by 57.2. Baylor: 67 by 50.2. Texas: 37 by 68.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.