Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2008-2011Michigan
RB • 6'1" • Trotwood, OH, USA
Michael Shaw leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.3 efficiency.
Usage Score
6.7
Efficiency
38.3
Consistency
20.2
Season Value
24.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Shaw, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan. Michael Shaw leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.3 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Michigan paired 477 primary output with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Scrimmage Yards / G
22.4
Efficiency
38.3
Usage
6.7
Consistency
20.2
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: -3. Eastern Michigan: 3. Minnesota: 60. Northwestern: 37. Purdue: 56. Illinois: 4. Nebraska: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 2 by 0. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 31.3. Minnesota: 8 by 78.1. Northwestern: 7 by 48.1. Purdue: 5 by 96.7. Illinois: 3 by 13.9. Nebraska: 2 by 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
96.7 vs Purdue
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan | 247 | 47.8 | 10.4 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 190 | 34.9 | 8.6 | -57 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan | 477 | 48.7 | 12 | 287 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 477 | 48.7 | 12 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 157 | 38.3 | 6.7 | -320 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
133
Primary metric
133 scrimmage yards and 25.5 usage.
#2
Minnesota
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 15 usage.
#3
Purdue
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 8.1 usage.
#4
Unknown
73
Primary metric
Game with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 13 usage.
#5
Minnesota
60
Primary metric
Win with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
60 scrimmage yards and 12.3 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Michigan
477 primary output · 48.7 efficiency · 12 usage
55.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Michigan
55.3
477 primary · 48.7 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Michigan
37.8
247 primary · 47.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9195
Trotwood-Madison · Dayton, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,071
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Michael Shaw quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit