Player Dossier

2009-2012

Michigan

Roy Roundtree

WR • 6'0" • Trotwood, OH, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Roy Roundtree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

18.1

Efficiency

81.5

Consistency

38.1

Season Value

50.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan

09101011111212

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Michigan
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Roy Roundtree, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan. Roy Roundtree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Roy Roundtree played WR for Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Roy Roundtree recorded 2,291 receiving yards and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Michigan.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Michigan paired 935 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Michigan

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

44.6

Efficiency

81.5

Usage

18.1

Consistency

38.1

Best Game by takeover score

South Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 27. Alabama: 12. Air Force: 5. Massachusetts: 25. Notre Dame: 30. Purdue: 23. Illinois: 33. Michigan State: 15. Nebraska: 32. Minnesota: 64. Northwestern: 139. Iowa: 83. Ohio State: 92

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 3 by 60. Alabama: 2 by 40. Air Force: 1 by 33.3. Massachusetts: 2 by 83.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 66.7. Purdue: 2 by 76.7. Illinois: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 5 by 100. Iowa: 5 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.4 · Games = 8 · +9.8 vs Losses
Losses38.6 · Games = 5 · -9.8 vs Wins
First Half22.1 · Games = 7 · -48.7 vs Second Half
Second Half70.8 · Games = 6 · +48.7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Northwestern

Best efficiency game

100 vs Ohio State

Result
Tue 1/1vs South CarolinaL 28-3332799016
Sat 11/24@ Ohio StateL 21-2639230.730.70175
Sat 11/17vs IowaW 42-1758316.616.60137
Sat 11/10vs Northwestern100 receiving yardsW 38-31513927.827.80053
Sat 11/3@ MinnesotaW 35-132643232047
Sun 10/28@ NebraskaL 9-231323232032
Sat 10/20vs Michigan StateW 12-101151515015
Sat 10/13vs IllinoisW 45-01333333033
Sat 10/6@ PurdueW 44-1322311.511.50013
Sat 9/22@ Notre DameL 6-133301010011
Sat 9/15vs MassachusettsW 63-1322512.512.50118
Sat 9/8vs Air ForceW 31-25155505
Sun 9/2@ AlabamaL 14-412126607

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Michigan

    2009-2012

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2009201020102011201120122012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2009 Regular SeasonMichigan43480.529.7
2010 PostseasonMichigan93560.730.6501
2010 Regular SeasonMichigan93560.730.60
2011 PostseasonMichigan34285.615.6-593
2011 Regular SeasonMichigan34285.615.60
2012 PostseasonMichigan58081.518.1238
2012 Regular SeasonMichigan58081.518.10

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Purdue

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

126

Primary metric

126 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.

#2

Illinois

246

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

246 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Northwestern

139

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Northwestern

83

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Ohio State

116

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

116 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2010 Postseason · Michigan

935 primary output · 60.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage

58.6

#2

2010 Regular Season · Michigan

58.6

935 primary · 60.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage

#3

2009 Regular Season · Michigan

54.1

434 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 29.7 usage

Milestones

7

100+ receiving yards

6

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2020 · Rating 0.78

Clarke Prep School · Grove Hill, AL

Committed To
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2020

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

2,291

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.