Usage Score
31.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Michigan
RB • 6'0" • Dorchester, MA, USA
Michael Cox leans workhorse runner traits and 33 efficiency.
Usage Score
31.6
Efficiency
33
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
54.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Cox, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Michael Cox leans workhorse runner traits and 33 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 773 primary output with 33 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 33 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
64.4
Efficiency
33
Usage
31.6
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: -4. Indiana: 34. Michigan: 76. Miami (OH): 188. Ohio: 80. Western Michigan: 19. Bowling Green: 37. Vanderbilt: 105. Northern Illinois: 93. Akron: 44. Buffalo: 32. Central Michigan: 69
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 5 by 0. Indiana: 19 by 22.5. Michigan: 18 by 44. Miami (OH): 30 by 65.3. Ohio: 22 by 37.9. Western Michigan: 12 by 17.4. Bowling Green: 11 by 37.1. Vanderbilt: 20 by 42.5. Northern Illinois: 27 by 34.6. Akron: 15 by 30.6. Buffalo: 14 by 24.4. Central Michigan: 18 by 40.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
65.3 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan | L 21-42 | 17 | 66 | 3.90 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Buffalo | L 19-29 | 13 | 31 | 2.40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Akron | W 22-14 | 15 | 44 | 2.90 | 0 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-63 | 25 | 81 | 3.20 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-49 | 17 | 56 | 3.30 | 0 | 3 | 49 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Bowling Green | L 0-24 | 10 | 37 | 3.70 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Western Michigan | L 14-52 | 11 | 19 | 1.70 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ohio | L 34-37 | 22 | 80 | 3.60 | 0 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Miami (OH)100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 16-27 | 30 | 188 | 6.30 | 2 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Michigan | L 13-63 | 18 | 76 | 4.20 | 0 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Indiana | L 6-45 | 15 | 36 | 2.40 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 1.8 |
| Thu 8/30 | @ UConn | L 0-37 | 5 | -4 | -0.80 | 0 | — | — | -0.8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2009-2011
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2012
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 124 | 89.5 | 10.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 56 | 88.9 | 7.6 | -68 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | -56 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 773 | 33 | 31.6 | 773 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
188
Primary metric
188 scrimmage yards and 43.5 usage.
#2
Bowling Green
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 7.6 usage.
#3
Unknown
93
Primary metric
Game with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
93 scrimmage yards and 17.4 usage.
#4
Eastern Michigan
31
Primary metric
Win with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
31 scrimmage yards and 4.3 usage.
#5
Vanderbilt
105
Primary metric
Loss with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
105 scrimmage yards and 36.4 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
773 primary output · 33 efficiency · 31.6 usage
54.5
#2
2010 Regular Season · Michigan
50.9
56 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 7.6 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Michigan
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.78
Chaminade College Prep · St. Louis, MO
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
953
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Michael Cox quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit