Usage Score
7.2
Player Dossier
2008-2012Michigan
RB • 5'11" • Cypress, TX, USA
Sam McGuffie leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 65.8 efficiency.
Usage Score
7.2
Efficiency
65.8
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
44.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam McGuffie, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice. Sam McGuffie leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 65.8 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rice paired 1,267 primary output with 49.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Rice.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
47.6
Efficiency
65.8
Usage
7.2
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 80. UCLA: 63. Kansas: 29. Louisiana Tech: -8. Marshall: 109. Houston: 119. Memphis: 13. UTSA: 21. Tulsa: 69. Southern Miss: 19. Tulane: 45. SMU: 53. UTEP: 7
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 5 by 100. UCLA: 8 by 65.6. Kansas: 5 by 67.9. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 0. Marshall: 4 by 100. Houston: 6 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 21.7. UTSA: 4 by 21.9. Tulsa: 9 by 75.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 100. SMU: 6 by 73.6. UTEP: 2 by 29.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | @ Air Force | W 33-14 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 80 | 16 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ UTEP | W 33-24 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs SMU | W 36-14 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Tulane | W 49-47 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Southern Miss | W 44-17 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 19 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Tulsa | L 24-28 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 62 | 7.7 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs UTSA | W 34-14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Memphis | L 10-14 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 13 | 2.6 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Houston2+ TD | L 14-35 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 119 | 19.8 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Marshall2+ TD | L 51-54 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 109 | 27.3 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 37-56 | 1 | -5 | -5 | 0 | 1 | -3 | -4 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Kansas | W 25-24 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 5.8 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs UCLA | L 24-49 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 63 | 7.9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2008
Opening stop
Rice
2009-2012
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan | 661 | 49.4 | 29.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | -661 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 1,267 | 49.7 | 34 | 1,267 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 230 | 46.5 | 11.7 | -1,037 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 619 | 65.8 | 7.2 | 389 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 619 | 65.8 | 7.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with 197 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
197
Primary metric
197 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#2
Tulsa
178
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
178 scrimmage yards and 59.6 usage.
#3
Houston
119
Primary metric
Loss with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
119 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#4
Notre Dame
178
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
178 scrimmage yards and 48.3 usage.
#5
Marshall
109
Primary metric
Loss with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 5.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Rice
1,267 primary output · 49.7 efficiency · 34 usage
63.4
#2
2008 Regular Season · Michigan
44.8
661 primary · 49.4 efficiency · 29.9 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Rice
44.5
619 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 7.2 usage
10
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9228
Cy-Fair · Cypress, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,777
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sam McGuffie quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit