Player Dossier

2008-2010

Miami (OH)

DeMarco Paine

WR • 5'10" • St. Louis, MO, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

DeMarco Paine reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

11.2

Efficiency

56.5

Consistency

51.5

Season Value

54.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami (OH)

081010

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
3
Program Path
Iowa • Miami (OH)
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

DeMarco Paine, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami (OH). DeMarco Paine reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

DeMarco Paine played WR for Iowa and Miami (OH). Across 2 tracked seasons, DeMarco Paine recorded -16 rushing yards and 286 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Miami (OH).

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Miami (OH) paired 270 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 56.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa, Miami (OH).

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Miami (OH)

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

19.3

Efficiency

56.5

Usage

11.2

Consistency

51.5

Best Game by takeover score

Middle Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 33. Florida: 11. Eastern Michigan: -1. Colorado State: 32. Missouri: 31. Kent State: 11. Cincinnati: 0. Central Michigan: 10. Ohio: 49. Buffalo: 35. Bowling Green: 11. Akron: 20. Temple: 19. Northern Illinois: 9

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 73.3. Florida: 2 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 0. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 24.4. Central Michigan: 1 by 66.7. Ohio: 4 by 81.7. Buffalo: 4 by 58.3. Bowling Green: 1 by 73.3. Akron: 5 by 26.7. Temple: 2 by 63.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 30

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins17.9 · Games = 10 · -4.9 vs Losses
Losses22.8 · Games = 4 · +4.9 vs Wins
First Half16.7 · Games = 7 · -5.1 vs Second Half
Second Half21.9 · Games = 7 · +5.1 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

14 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Ohio

Best efficiency game

100 vs Missouri

Result
Fri 1/7vs Middle TennesseeW 35-213331111019
Sat 12/4vs Northern IllinoisW 26-21294.54.5005
Wed 11/24vs TempleW 23-32199.59.50014
Wed 11/17@ AkronW 19-1452044011
Thu 11/11@ Bowling GreenW 24-211111111011
Sat 10/30@ BuffaloW 21-94358.88.80012
Sat 10/23vs OhioL 13-344497.212.30017
Sat 10/16@ Central MichiganW 27-201101010010
Sat 10/9@ CincinnatiL 3-45
Sat 10/2vs Kent StateW 27-213113.73.7005
Sat 9/25@ MissouriL 13-5123115.515.50027
Sat 9/18vs Colorado StateW 31-102321616020
Sat 9/11vs Eastern MichiganW 28-211-1-2-100
Sat 9/4@ FloridaL 12-342115.55.5007

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Iowa

    2008

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Miami (OH)

    2010

    Final stop

Season Progression

200820102010
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2008 Regular SeasonIowa1646.78.7
2010 PostseasonMiami (OH)27056.511.2254
2010 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)27056.511.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Ohio

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

49

Primary metric

49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.

#2

Unknown

12

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.

#3

Colorado State

32

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Missouri

31

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Middle Tennessee

33

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2010 Postseason · Miami (OH)

270 primary output · 56.5 efficiency · 11.2 usage

54.8

#2

2010 Regular Season · Miami (OH)

54.8

270 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 11.2 usage

#3

2008 Regular Season · Iowa

32.3

16 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2010 · Rating 0.8111

Hazelwood East · St. Louis, MO

Committed To
Miami (OH)
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2010

Career Facts

2

Career teams

3

Seasons tracked

286

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.