Usage Score
11.2
Player Dossier
2008-2010Miami (OH)
WR • 5'10" • St. Louis, MO, USA
DeMarco Paine reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.2
Efficiency
56.5
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami (OH)
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeMarco Paine, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Miami (OH). DeMarco Paine reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
DeMarco Paine played WR for Iowa and Miami (OH). Across 2 tracked seasons, DeMarco Paine recorded -16 rushing yards and 286 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Miami (OH).
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Miami (OH) paired 270 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 56.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa, Miami (OH).
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
19.3
Efficiency
56.5
Usage
11.2
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 33. Florida: 11. Eastern Michigan: -1. Colorado State: 32. Missouri: 31. Kent State: 11. Cincinnati: 0. Central Michigan: 10. Ohio: 49. Buffalo: 35. Bowling Green: 11. Akron: 20. Temple: 19. Northern Illinois: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 73.3. Florida: 2 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 0. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 24.4. Central Michigan: 1 by 66.7. Ohio: 4 by 81.7. Buffalo: 4 by 58.3. Bowling Green: 1 by 73.3. Akron: 5 by 26.7. Temple: 2 by 63.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 30
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/7 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 35-21 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Northern Illinois | W 26-21 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Wed 11/24 | vs Temple | W 23-3 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Wed 11/17 | @ Akron | W 19-14 | — | 5 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/11 | @ Bowling Green | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Buffalo | W 21-9 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Ohio | L 13-34 | — | 4 | 49 | 7.2 | 12.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Central Michigan | W 27-20 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Cincinnati | L 3-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Kent State | W 27-21 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Missouri | L 13-51 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Colorado State | W 31-10 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 28-21 | — | 1 | -1 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Florida | L 12-34 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa
2008
Opening stop
Miami (OH)
2010
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Iowa | 16 | 46.7 | 8.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 270 | 56.5 | 11.2 | 254 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 270 | 56.5 | 11.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
12
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Miami (OH)
270 primary output · 56.5 efficiency · 11.2 usage
54.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
54.8
270 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Iowa
32.3
16 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8111
Hazelwood East · St. Louis, MO
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
286
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.