Usage Score
11.9
Player Profile
Sean Renfree
QB • 6'5" • Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Sean Renfree is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.7
Consistency
75.8
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Duke
0910111212
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Duke
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Duke
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Sean Renfree, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Duke. Sean Renfree is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Duke paired 3,084 primary output with 52.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Loss with 428 yards of offense and 55.5 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Duke
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
255.3
Efficiency
58.7
Usage
11.9
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 364. Florida International: 294. Stanford: 189. Unknown: 284. Memphis: 334. Wake Forest: 191. Virginia Tech: 205. North Carolina: 272. Florida State: 92. Clemson: 215. Georgia Tech: 195. Miami: 428
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 51 by 62.5. Florida International: 32 by 64.3. Stanford: 43 by 47.9. Unknown: 36 by 68.8. Memphis: 40 by 74.2. Wake Forest: 30 by 56.3. Virginia Tech: 39 by 52. North Carolina: 38 by 54.2. Florida State: 21 by 66.1. Clemson: 44 by 52.6. Georgia Tech: 43 by 50.3. Miami: 62 by 55.5
Split Comparison
Wins272.8 · n=4 · +31.6 vs Losses
Losses241.1 · n=7 · -31.6 vs Wins
First Half276 · n=6 · +41.5 vs Second Half
Second Half234.5 · n=6 · -41.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
74.2 vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Cincinnati300-yard game | L 34-48 | 37 | 49 | 358 | 75.5 | 1 | 2 | 62.5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Miami300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 45-52 | 36 | 59 | 432 | 61.0 | 4 | 0 | 55.5 | 3 | -4 | -1.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Georgia Tech3+ TD | L 24-42 | 24 | 36 | 198 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 50.3 | 7 | -3 | -0.40 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Clemson | L 20-56 | 23 | 39 | 240 | 59.0 | 1 | 0 | 52.6 | 5 | -25 | -5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | L 7-48 | 13 | 21 | 92 | 61.9 | 0 | 0 | 66.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Carolina | W 33-30 | 23 | 36 | 276 | 63.9 | 1 | 1 | 54.2 | 2 | -4 | -2 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Virginia Tech | L 20-41 | 20 | 33 | 235 | 60.6 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 6 | -30 | -5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Wake Forest | W 34-27 | 22 | 28 | 204 | 78.6 | 0 | 1 | 56.3 | 2 | -13 | -6.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Memphis300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-14 | 26 | 37 | 314 | 70.3 | 4 | 1 | 74.2 | 3 | 20 | 6.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 24 | 33 | 274 | 72.7 | 3 | 0 | 68.8 | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Stanford | L 13-50 | 28 | 40 | 200 | 70.0 | 0 | 2 | 47.9 | 3 | -11 | -3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Florida International | W 46-26 | 21 | 30 | 290 | 70.0 | 2 | 1 | 64.3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Duke | 318 | 54.4 | 10.4 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Duke | 3,084 | 52.3 | 13.8 | 2,766 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Duke | 2,833 | 55.1 | 17 | -251 |
| 2012 Postseason | Duke | 3,063 | 58.7 | 11.9 | 230 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Duke | 3,063 | 58.7 | 11.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with 106 yards of offense and 95.8 efficiency.
106
Primary metric
106 total offense with 95.8 efficiency.
#2
Navy
342
Primary metric
Win with 342 yards of offense and 77.9 efficiency.
342 total offense with 77.9 efficiency.
#3
Boston College
376
Primary metric
Win with 376 yards of offense and 59.8 efficiency.
376 total offense with 59.8 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
65
Primary metric
Game with 65 yards of offense and 59.5 efficiency.
65 total offense with 59.5 efficiency.
#5
Florida International
340
Primary metric
Win with 340 yards of offense and 61.7 efficiency.
340 total offense with 61.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Duke
3,084 primary output · 52.3 efficiency · 13.8 usage
61.6
#2
2012 Postseason · Duke
61.3
3,063 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 11.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Duke
61.3
3,063 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 11.9 usage
Milestones
18
250+ passing yards
10
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
13
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.897
Notre Dame Preparatory · Scottsdale, AZ
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
9,298
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.