Usage Score
27.4
Player Dossier
2008-2011Northwestern
Jeremy Ebert
WR • 6'0" • Hilliard, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jeremy Ebert reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
64.6
Season Value
67.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Northwestern
08090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Northwestern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Ebert, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Northwestern. Jeremy Ebert reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Northwestern paired 953 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Northwestern
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
88.3
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
27.4
Consistency
64.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 35. Boston College: 54. Army: 108. Illinois: 76. Michigan: 86. Iowa: 107. Penn State: 109. Indiana: 29. Nebraska: 147. Rice: 208. Minnesota: 62. Michigan State: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 4 by 58.3. Boston College: 4 by 90. Army: 6 by 100. Illinois: 5 by 100. Michigan: 11 by 52.1. Iowa: 13 by 54.9. Penn State: 5 by 100. Indiana: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 6 by 100. Rice: 7 by 100. Minnesota: 6 by 68.9. Michigan State: 7 by 37.1
Split Comparison
Wins100 · n=5 · +20 vs Losses
Losses80 · n=7 · -20 vs Wins
First Half77.7 · n=6 · -21.3 vs Second Half
Second Half99 · n=6 · +21.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs Texas A&M | L 22-33 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan State | L 17-31 | — | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Minnesota | W 28-13 | — | 6 | 62 | 9.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 28-6 | — | 7 | 208 | 29.7 | 29.70 | 2 | 90 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Nebraska100 receiving yards | W 28-25 | — | 6 | 147 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 1 | 81 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Indiana | W 59-38 | — | 1 | 29 | 21 | 29 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Penn State100 receiving yards | L 24-34 | — | 5 | 109 | 19.2 | 21.80 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-41 | — | 13 | 107 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs MichiganHigh volume | L 24-42 | — | 11 | 86 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Illinois2+ TD | L 35-38 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 3 | 39 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Army100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 14-21 | — | 6 | 108 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 62 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Boston College | W 24-17 | — | 4 | 54 | 11.6 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northwestern
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Northwestern | 161 | 59.3 | 11.5 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Northwestern | 226 | 68.3 | 6.8 | 65 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Northwestern | 226 | 68.3 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Northwestern | 953 | 90 | 23.4 | 727 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Northwestern | 953 | 90 | 23.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Northwestern | 1,060 | 80.1 | 27.4 | 107 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Northwestern | 1,060 | 80.1 | 27.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
208
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
208 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
124
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 75.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Northwestern
953 primary output · 90 efficiency · 23.4 usage
69.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Northwestern
69.4
953 primary · 90 efficiency · 23.4 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Northwestern
67.9
1,060 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 27.4 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8256
Hilliard Darby · Hilliard, OH
- Committed To
- Northwestern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,400
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.