Player Dossier

2008-2011

Wake Forest

Andrew Parker

TE • 6'5" • Jacksonville, FL, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Andrew Parker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

5.2

Efficiency

55.3

Consistency

78.4

Season Value

45.5

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest

0809101111

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Wake Forest
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Andrew Parker, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Andrew Parker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Wake Forest paired 90 primary output with 68.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Wake Forest

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

9.2

Efficiency

55.3

Usage

5.2

Consistency

78.4

Best Game by takeover score

Mississippi State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 9. Syracuse: 8. Unknown: 11. Notre Dame: 15. Clemson: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 2 by 30. Syracuse: 1 by 53.3. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 20

Split Comparison

Losses8.8 · n=4
First Half9.3 · n=3 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half9 · n=2 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games9.2 · n=5

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

5 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Best efficiency game

100 vs Notre Dame

Result
Fri 12/30vs Mississippi StateL 17-23294.54.5006
Sat 11/12@ ClemsonL 28-31133303
Sun 11/6vs Notre DameL 17-241151515015
Sat 9/17vs Unknown1111111011
Fri 9/2@ SyracuseL 29-36188808

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Wake Forest

    2008-2011

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20082009201020112011
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2008 Regular SeasonWake Forest10656.77.8
2009 Regular SeasonWake Forest9068.39.3-16
2010 Regular SeasonWake Forest3742.810.5-53
2011 PostseasonWake Forest4655.35.29
2011 Regular SeasonWake Forest4655.35.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Florida State

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

55

Primary metric

55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Notre Dame

15

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Maryland

42

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.

#4

Duke

37

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Duke

28

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest

90 primary output · 68.3 efficiency · 9.3 usage

55.5

#2

2008 Regular Season · Wake Forest

46.6

106 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 7.8 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · Wake Forest

45.5

46 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 5.2 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2020 · Rating 0.77

Pacifica · Oxnard, CA

Committed To
Cal Poly
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2020

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

279

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Andrew Parker quick answers

Recruiting profile

2-star recruit

Position
TE
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
5
Career receiving yards
279