Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2008-2011Wake Forest
TE • 6'5" • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Andrew Parker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
55.3
Consistency
78.4
Season Value
45.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Parker, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Andrew Parker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 90 primary output with 68.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
9.2
Efficiency
55.3
Usage
5.2
Consistency
78.4
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 9. Syracuse: 8. Unknown: 11. Notre Dame: 15. Clemson: 3
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 2 by 30. Syracuse: 1 by 53.3. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 20
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 106 | 56.7 | 7.8 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 90 | 68.3 | 9.3 | -16 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 37 | 42.8 | 10.5 | -53 |
| 2011 Postseason | Wake Forest | 46 | 55.3 | 5.2 | 9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 46 | 55.3 | 5.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Primary metric
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Maryland
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest
90 primary output · 68.3 efficiency · 9.3 usage
55.5
#2
2008 Regular Season · Wake Forest
46.6
106 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Wake Forest
45.5
46 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 5.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.77
Pacifica · Oxnard, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
279
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Andrew Parker quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit