Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2008-2010BYU
WR • 6'2" • Harmony, FL, USA
O'Neill Chambers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.5
Efficiency
68.4
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
26.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
O'Neill Chambers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · BYU. O'Neill Chambers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
O'Neill Chambers played WR for BYU. Across 3 tracked seasons, O'Neill Chambers recorded 16 rushing yards, 466 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with BYU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
BYU paired 376 primary output with 70 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
9.6
Efficiency
68.4
Usage
12.5
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 21. Air Force: 0. Florida State: 27. San Diego State: 0. TCU: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
90 vs Florida State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | BYU | 42 | 73.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | BYU | 376 | 70 | 11.5 | 334 |
| 2009 Regular Season | BYU | 376 | 70 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 48 | 68.4 | 12.5 | -328 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70
Primary metric
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UNLV
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida State
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · BYU
376 primary output · 70 efficiency · 11.5 usage
60.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · BYU
60.2
376 primary · 70 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · BYU
26.7
48 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 12.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8567
Harmony · St. Cloud, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
466
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.