Usage Score
17.3
Player Dossier
2009-2012Missouri
Gahn McGaffie
WR • 5'10" • Galena Park, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Gahn McGaffie reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
56.9
Consistency
74.6
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Missouri
091010111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gahn McGaffie, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Missouri. Gahn McGaffie reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Gahn McGaffie played WR for Missouri. Across 4 tracked seasons, Gahn McGaffie recorded 324 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Missouri.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Missouri paired 266 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Missouri
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
26.6
Efficiency
56.9
Usage
17.3
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 34. Arizona State: 25. South Carolina: 7. UCF: 26. Vanderbilt: 32. Kentucky: 40. Florida: 47. Tennessee: 15. Syracuse: 14. Texas A&M: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 5 by 45.3. Arizona State: 4 by 41.7. South Carolina: 2 by 23.3. UCF: 2 by 86.7. Vanderbilt: 5 by 42.7. Kentucky: 4 by 66.7. Florida: 4 by 78.3. Tennessee: 3 by 33.3. Syracuse: 1 by 93.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 57.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins26.5 · Games = 4 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses26.7 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half24.8 · Games = 5 · -3.6 vs Second Half
Second Half28.4 · Games = 5 · +3.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | @ Texas A&M | L 29-59 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Syracuse | L 27-31 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tennessee | W 51-48 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Florida | L 7-14 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Kentucky | W 33-10 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Vanderbilt | L 15-19 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UCF | W 21-16 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ South Carolina | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Arizona State | W 24-20 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Georgia | L 20-41 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Missouri | 40 | 41.7 | 6 | 40 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Missouri | 40 | 41.7 | 6 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Missouri | 18 | 40 | 5.5 | -22 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Missouri | 18 | 40 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Missouri | 266 | 56.9 | 17.3 | 248 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27
Primary metric
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
Florida
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#3
Kentucky
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
North Carolina
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Missouri
266 primary output · 56.9 efficiency · 17.3 usage
62.1
#2
2011 Postseason · Missouri
28
18 primary · 40 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Missouri
28
18 primary · 40 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8744
Galena Park · Galena Park, TX
- Committed To
- Missouri
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
324
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.