Player Stats

Jeff Demps College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,951
Rushing yards
2,470
Receiving yards
481
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonFlorida1323230060.7
2008 Regular SeasonFlorida13723582141860.7
2009 PostseasonFlorida14770067.8
2009 Regular SeasonFlorida1479073852767.8
2010 PostseasonFlorida1025205063
2010 Regular SeasonFlorida10642531111363
2011 PostseasonFlorida1237307056.7
2011 Regular SeasonFlorida12704539165756.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Florida paired 797 primary output with 68.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Florida

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

61.8

Efficiency

45.4

Usage

19.1

Consistency

33.8

Best Game by takeover score

Vanderbilt

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 37. Florida Atlantic: 126. UAB: 20. Tennessee: 85. Kentucky: 159. Alabama: 6. LSU: 0. Georgia: 84. Vanderbilt: 172. South Carolina: 33. Furman: 27. Florida State: -8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 8 by 46.1. Florida Atlantic: 15 by 85. UAB: 3 by 59. Tennessee: 14 by 55.3. Kentucky: 11 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 14.6. LSU: 2 by 0. Georgia: 9 by 48.3. Vanderbilt: 25 by 71.6. South Carolina: 9 by 38.2. Furman: 10 by 26.9. Florida State: 4 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins89.4 · Games = 7 · +66.4 vs Losses
Losses23 · Games = 5 · -66.4 vs Wins