Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2008-2008Washington State
WR • 5'9" • 199 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Kevin Norrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11
Efficiency
70.3
Consistency
63.2
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Washington State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kevin Norrell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Washington State. Kevin Norrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kevin Norrell played WR for Washington State. Across 1 tracked season, Kevin Norrell recorded 124 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Washington State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Washington State paired 124 primary output with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
15.5
Efficiency
70.3
Usage
11
Consistency
63.2
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 17. Unknown: 18. Oregon: 0. Stanford: 15. Arizona: 3. Arizona State: 7. Washington: 31. Hawai'i: 33
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 2 by 56.7. Unknown: 1 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 20. Arizona State: 1 by 46.7. Washington: 3 by 68.9. Hawai'i: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Best efficiency game
100 vs Hawai'i
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington State
2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Washington State | 124 | 70.3 | 11 | — |
#1 Featured game
Hawai'i
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
18
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
17
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Washington State
124 primary output · 70.3 efficiency · 11 usage
60.9
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8389
Long Beach Poly · Long Beach, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
124
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.