Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2009-2012Nebraska
TE • 6'3" • Shawnee, KS, USA
Kyler Reed reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.4
Efficiency
83.3
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
63.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Nebraska
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyler Reed, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Nebraska. Kyler Reed reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kyler Reed played TE for Nebraska. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kyler Reed recorded -3 rushing yards, 1,063 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Nebraska.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Nebraska paired 395 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
29.8
Efficiency
83.3
Usage
11.4
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 3. Southern Miss: 57. UCLA: 28. Arkansas State: 22. Unknown: 13. Wisconsin: 21. Northwestern: 36. Michigan: 23. Michigan State: 41. Penn State: 60. Minnesota: 24. Wisconsin: 29
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 20. Southern Miss: 5 by 76. UCLA: 2 by 93.3. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 86.7. Wisconsin: 2 by 70. Northwestern: 2 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 76.7. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 80. Wisconsin: 2 by 96.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Georgia | L 31-45 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Wisconsin | L 31-70 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Minnesota | W 38-14 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Penn State | W 32-23 | — | 2 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Michigan State | W 28-24 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 10/28 | vs Michigan | W 23-9 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Northwestern | W 29-28 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Wisconsin | W 30-27 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Arkansas State | W 42-13 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ UCLA | L 30-36 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Southern Miss | W 49-20 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Nebraska | 54 | 51.1 | 6.4 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Nebraska | 395 | 81.1 | 20.7 | 341 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Nebraska | 395 | 81.1 | 20.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Nebraska | 257 | 86.4 | 12.8 | -138 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Nebraska | 257 | 86.4 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Nebraska | 357 | 83.3 | 11.4 | 100 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Nebraska | 357 | 83.3 | 11.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61
Primary metric
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas State
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Nebraska
395 primary output · 81.1 efficiency · 20.7 usage
67.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Nebraska
67.3
395 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Nebraska
63.7
357 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 11.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.77
Union · Camas, WA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,063
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.