Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Boston College paired 338 primary output with 66 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Boston College | 11 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 63.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Boston College | 11 | 24 | 216 | 1 | 63.8 |
| 2010 Postseason | Boston College | 12 | 4 | 47 | 0 | 71.4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boston College | 12 | 27 | 291 | 1 | 71.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boston College | 8 | 21 | 236 | 3 | 60.6 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Boston College | 6 | 21 | 189 | 2 | 62.8 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Boston College paired 338 primary output with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
31.5
Efficiency
59.4
Usage
18.3
Consistency
75.2
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 20. Maryland: 54. Wake Forest: 37. Notre Dame: 14. Virginia Tech: 36. NC State: 28
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 2 by 66.7. Maryland: 4 by 90. Wake Forest: 4 by 61.7. Notre Dame: 3 by 31.1. Virginia Tech: 4 by 60. NC State: 4 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.