Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Boston College paired 1,526 primary output with 47.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Boston College | 13 | 93 | 68 | 25 | 1 | 68.2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Boston College | 13 | 967 | 832 | 135 | 5 | 68.2 |
| 2009 Postseason | Boston College | 13 | 102 | 102 | 0 | 1 | 78.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Boston College | 13 | 1,424 | 1,355 | 69 | 14 | 78.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boston College | 11 | 1,355 | 1,243 | 112 | 9 | 78.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boston College | 2 | 171 | 135 | 36 | 0 | 51.4 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Temple | 10 | 1,144 | 1,054 | 90 | 12 | 69.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Boston College paired 1,526 primary output with 47.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Boston College, Temple.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
114.4
Efficiency
50.7
Usage
36.1
Consistency
51.4
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Villanova: 20. Penn State: 65. South Florida: 148. UConn: 155. Rutgers: 81. Pittsburgh: 85. Louisville: 115. Cincinnati: 19. Army: 351. Syracuse: 105
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Villanova: 6 by 28.9. Penn State: 13 by 35.2. South Florida: 27 by 57.5. UConn: 31 by 50.4. Rutgers: 19 by 44.4. Pittsburgh: 19 by 43.6. Louisville: 15 by 79.9. Cincinnati: 8 by 24.7. Army: 36 by 90.6. Syracuse: 22 by 51.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.