Player Stats

Johnathan Franklin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,920
Rushing yards
4,403
Receiving yards
517
Touchdowns
34

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonUCLA13660047.9
2009 Regular SeasonUCLA1361756057547.9
2010 Regular SeasonUCLA121,1901,12763869.3
2011 PostseasonUCLA1429290059.1
2011 Regular SeasonUCLA141,02194774659.1
2012 PostseasonUCLA1438344082.7
2012 Regular SeasonUCLA142,0191,7003191582.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

UCLA paired 2,057 primary output with 61.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 61.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · UCLA

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

146.9

Efficiency

61.5

Usage

34.5

Consistency

70.6

Best Game by takeover score

Nebraska

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 38. Rice: 218. Nebraska: 276. Houston: 168. Oregon State: 56. Colorado: 159. California: 110. Utah: 90. Arizona State: 168. Arizona: 190. Washington State: 111. USC: 185. Stanford: 72. Stanford: 216

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 15 by 25.7. Rice: 16 by 100. Nebraska: 29 by 89.7. Houston: 29 by 51.6. Oregon State: 13 by 41.4. Colorado: 18 by 83.1. California: 18 by 68. Utah: 23 by 38.7. Arizona State: 27 by 65.3. Arizona: 27 by 71.5. Washington State: 23 by 41.8. USC: 31 by 61.7. Stanford: 24 by 31.8. Stanford: 22 by 90.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins173.9 · Games = 9 · +75.5 vs Losses
Losses98.4 · Games = 5 · -75.5 vs Wins