Usage Score
11.3
Player Dossier
2008-2011California
Anthony Miller
TE • 6'4" • San Jose, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Anthony Miller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63.6
Consistency
49.6
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · California
080909101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- California
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Miller, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · California. Anthony Miller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
California paired 357 primary output with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · California
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
21.9
Efficiency
63.6
Usage
11.3
Consistency
49.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 9. Fresno State: 32. Colorado: 27. Unknown: 9. Washington: 5. Oregon: 21. Utah: 44. UCLA: 67. Washington State: 19. Oregon State: 4. Stanford: 16. Arizona State: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 1 by 60. Fresno State: 2 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 90. Unknown: 1 by 60. Washington: 1 by 33.3. Oregon: 4 by 35. Utah: 1 by 100. UCLA: 5 by 89.3. Washington State: 1 by 100. Oregon State: 1 by 26.7. Stanford: 3 by 35.6. Arizona State: 2 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins22.7 · n=6 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses23.6 · n=5 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half17.2 · n=6 · -9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half26.7 · n=6 · +9.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Texas | L 10-21 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Arizona State | W 47-38 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Stanford | L 28-31 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Oregon State | W 23-6 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Washington State | W 30-7 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UCLA | L 14-31 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Utah | W 34-10 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 44 |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Oregon | L 15-43 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Washington | L 23-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado2+ TD | W 36-33 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Fresno State | W 36-21 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
California
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | California | 2 | 13.3 | 10 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | California | 357 | 78.3 | 15.8 | 355 |
| 2009 Regular Season | California | 357 | 78.3 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | California | 152 | 52.1 | 10.3 | -205 |
| 2011 Postseason | California | 263 | 63.6 | 11.3 | 111 |
| 2011 Regular Season | California | 263 | 63.6 | 11.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70
Primary metric
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 89.3 efficiency score.
#3
Nevada
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon State
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · California
357 primary output · 78.3 efficiency · 15.8 usage
64.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · California
64.5
357 primary · 78.3 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · California
52.8
263 primary · 63.6 efficiency · 11.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8789
Archbishop Mitty · San Jose, CA
- Committed To
- California
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
774
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.