Player Stats

Austin Zouzalik College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,245
Receptions
98
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonTexas Tech13375066.4
2009 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1332394266.4
2010 PostseasonTexas Tech11550162.6
2010 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1126382162.6
2011 Regular SeasonTexas Tech913121144.8
2012 PostseasonTexas Tech12-0046.6
2012 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1219223046.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Texas Tech paired 469 primary output with 80 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 74.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: TCU

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Texas Tech

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

18.6

Efficiency

74.3

Usage

6.5

Consistency

43.2

Best Game by takeover score

TCU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Northwestern State: 7. Texas State: 12. New Mexico: 0. Iowa State: 0. West Virginia: 16. TCU: 55. Kansas State: 37. Texas: 5. Kansas: 45. Oklahoma State: 24. Baylor: 22

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern State: 1 by 46.7. Texas State: 1 by 80. West Virginia: 1 by 100. TCU: 5 by 73.3. Kansas State: 3 by 82.2. Texas: 1 by 33.3. Kansas: 3 by 100. Oklahoma State: 2 by 80. Baylor: 2 by 73.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins16.9 · Games = 8 · -5.1 vs Losses
Losses22 · Games = 4 · +5.1 vs Wins