Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2008-2008Stanford
Warren Reuland
WR • 6'5" • 202 lbs • Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Warren Reuland reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.5
Consistency
79
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Stanford
08
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Warren Reuland, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Stanford. Warren Reuland reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Stanford paired 29 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2008 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
9.7
Efficiency
64.5
Usage
5.9
Consistency
79
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 10. USC: 13. California: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 1 by 66.7. USC: 1 by 86.7. California: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses9.5 · Games = 2
First Half11.5 · Games = 2
All Games9.7 · Games = 3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs USC
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Stanford | 29 | 64.5 | 5.9 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
13
Primary metric
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#2
Washington
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
California
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Stanford
29 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 5.9 usage
61.5
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.84
Mission Viejo · Mission Viejo, CA
- Committed To
- Oregon State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
29
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.