Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2008-2011TCU
WR • 6'2" • Arlington, TX, USA
Antoine Hicks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.8
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
50.8
Season Value
50.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antoine Hicks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · TCU. Antoine Hicks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
TCU paired 478 primary output with 87.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San Diego State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
31.5
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
17.8
Consistency
50.8
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 43. UL Monroe: 5. Unknown: 5. SMU: 28. San Diego State: 103. New Mexico: 18. BYU: 1. Wyoming: 50. Boise State: 45. Colorado State: 27. UNLV: 22
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 5 by 57.3. UL Monroe: 1 by 33.3. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. SMU: 4 by 46.7. San Diego State: 7 by 98.1. New Mexico: 2 by 60. BYU: 1 by 6.7. Wyoming: 2 by 100. Boise State: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 3 by 60. UNLV: 4 by 36.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
San Diego State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boise State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs UNLV | W 56-9 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Colorado State | W 34-10 | — | 3 | 27 | 7.3 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Boise State | W 36-35 | — | 3 | 45 | 9.8 | 15 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Wyoming | W 31-20 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs BYU | W 38-28 | — | 1 | 1 | -0.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs New Mexico | W 69-0 | — | 2 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ San Diego State100 receiving yards | W 27-14 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs SMU | L 33-40 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UL Monroe | W 38-17 | — | 1 | 5 | 3.5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Air Force | W 35-19 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | TCU | 69 | 64.7 | 7.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | TCU | 478 | 87.8 | 14.5 | 409 |
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 478 | 87.8 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | TCU | 175 | 62.7 | 8.3 | -303 |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 175 | 62.7 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | TCU | 347 | 57.5 | 17.8 | 172 |
#1 Featured game
San Diego State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · TCU
478 primary output · 87.8 efficiency · 14.5 usage
60.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · TCU
60.2
478 primary · 87.8 efficiency · 14.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · TCU
50.2
347 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9265
Mansfield Timberview · Arlington, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,069
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Antoine Hicks quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit