Usage Score
29.4
Player Dossier
2009-2011Oklahoma State
Justin Blackmon
WR • 6'1" • Ardmore, OK, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Justin Blackmon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.1
Consistency
72.5
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Oklahoma State
090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Blackmon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Justin Blackmon reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,782 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
117.1
Efficiency
77.1
Usage
29.4
Consistency
72.5
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 186. Louisiana: 144. Arizona: 128. Tulsa: 57. Texas A&M: 121. Kansas: 84. Texas: 74. Missouri: 54. Baylor: 172. Kansas State: 205. Texas Tech: 103. Iowa State: 99. Oklahoma: 95
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 8 by 100. Louisiana: 8 by 100. Arizona: 12 by 71.1. Tulsa: 7 by 54.3. Texas A&M: 11 by 73.3. Kansas: 8 by 70. Texas: 7 by 70.5. Missouri: 8 by 45. Baylor: 13 by 88.2. Kansas State: 13 by 100. Texas Tech: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 10 by 66. Oklahoma: 10 by 63.3
Split Comparison
Wins118.6 · n=12
First Half113.4 · n=7 · -7.9 vs Second Half
Second Half121.3 · n=6 · +7.9 vs First Half
All Games117.1 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/3 | vs Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-38 | — | 8 | 186 | 20.7 | 23.30 | 3 | 67 |
| Sun 12/4 | vs OklahomaHigh volume | W 44-10 | — | 10 | 95 | 8.7 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Iowa StateHigh volume | L 31-37 | — | 10 | 99 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 66-6 | — | 6 | 103 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 2 | 48 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Kansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-45 | — | 13 | 205 | 14.6 | 15.80 | 2 | 54 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Baylor100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-24 | — | 13 | 172 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ MissouriHigh volume | W 45-24 | — | 8 | 54 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Texas | W 38-26 | — | 7 | 74 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs KansasHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 70-28 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-29 | — | 11 | 121 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Tulsa | W 59-33 | — | 7 | 57 | 7.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 24 |
| Fri 9/9 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-14 | — | 12 | 128 | 10.3 | 10.70 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Louisiana100 receiving yards · High volume | W 61-34 | — | 8 | 144 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 260 | 75.5 | 12.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 260 | 75.5 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,782 | 93.3 | 33.1 | 1,522 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,782 | 93.3 | 33.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,522 | 77.1 | 29.4 | -260 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,522 | 77.1 | 29.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
207
Primary metric
207 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas State
205
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
205 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana
190
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
190 receiving yards with a 97.4 efficiency score.
#4
Baylor
172
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 88.2 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
186
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1,782 primary output · 93.3 efficiency · 33.1 usage
78
#2
2010 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
78
1,782 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 33.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State
66.3
1,522 primary · 77.1 efficiency · 29.4 usage
Milestones
19
100+ receiving yards
20
8+ catch outings
12
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8578
Plainview · Ardmore, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,564
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.