Player Stats

Terrance Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,334
Receptions
202
Touchdowns
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonBaylor10361030.2
2010 PostseasonBaylor13112045.9
2010 Regular SeasonBaylor1342472445.9
2011 PostseasonBaylor12662068
2011 Regular SeasonBaylor12538951168
2012 PostseasonBaylor13268091.9
2012 Regular SeasonBaylor13951,7641291.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Baylor paired 1,832 primary output with 96.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 96.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Baylor

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

140.9

Efficiency

96.9

Usage

32.1

Consistency

70.9

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 68. SMU: 138. Sam Houston: 131. UL Monroe: 84. West Virginia: 314. TCU: 163. Texas: 183. Iowa State: 190. Kansas: 137. Oklahoma: 91. Kansas State: 87. Texas Tech: 175. Oklahoma State: 71

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 2 by 100. SMU: 7 by 100. Sam Houston: 6 by 100. UL Monroe: 4 by 100. West Virginia: 17 by 100. TCU: 3 by 100. Texas: 10 by 100. Iowa State: 13 by 97.4. Kansas: 11 by 83. Oklahoma: 6 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 100. Texas Tech: 7 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 78.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins111.4 · Games = 8 · -76.8 vs Losses
Losses188.2 · Games = 5 · +76.8 vs Wins