Usage Score
32.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Baylor
Terrance Williams
WR • 6'2" • Dallas, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Terrance Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
96.9
Consistency
70.9
Season Value
75
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Baylor
09101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terrance Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Baylor. Terrance Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Baylor paired 1,832 primary output with 96.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 96.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Baylor
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
140.9
Efficiency
96.9
Usage
32.1
Consistency
70.9
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 68. SMU: 138. Unknown: 131. UL Monroe: 84. West Virginia: 314. TCU: 163. Texas: 183. Iowa State: 190. Kansas: 137. Oklahoma: 91. Kansas State: 87. Texas Tech: 175. Oklahoma State: 71
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 2 by 100. SMU: 7 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. UL Monroe: 4 by 100. West Virginia: 17 by 100. TCU: 3 by 100. Texas: 10 by 100. Iowa State: 13 by 97.4. Kansas: 11 by 83. Oklahoma: 6 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 100. Texas Tech: 7 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 78.9
Split Comparison
Wins108.6 · n=7 · -79.6 vs Losses
Losses188.2 · n=5 · +79.6 vs Wins
First Half154.4 · n=7 · +29.3 vs Second Half
Second Half125.2 · n=6 · -29.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | @ UCLA | W 49-26 | — | 2 | 68 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Oklahoma State | W 41-34 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards | W 52-45 | — | 7 | 175 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Kansas State | W 52-24 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Oklahoma | L 34-42 | — | 6 | 91 | 13.9 | 15.20 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Kansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-14 | — | 11 | 137 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-35 | — | 13 | 190 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 36 |
| Sun 10/21 | @ Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | L 50-56 | — | 10 | 183 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs TCU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 21-49 | — | 3 | 163 | 54.3 | 54.30 | 2 | 77 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | L 63-70 | — | 17 | 314 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ UL Monroe2+ TD | W 47-42 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 131 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 2 | 42 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs SMU100 receiving yards | W 59-24 | — | 7 | 138 | 18.3 | 19.70 | 0 | 48 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Baylor
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Baylor | 61 | 85 | 7.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Baylor | 484 | 62.2 | 14.7 | 423 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Baylor | 484 | 62.2 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Baylor | 957 | 87.9 | 20.8 | 473 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Baylor | 957 | 87.9 | 20.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Baylor | 1,832 | 96.9 | 32.1 | 875 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Baylor | 1,832 | 96.9 | 32.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
314
Primary metric
314 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
154
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas A&M
146
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
TCU
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Baylor
1,832 primary output · 96.9 efficiency · 32.1 usage
75
#2
2012 Regular Season · Baylor
75
1,832 primary · 96.9 efficiency · 32.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Baylor
56.2
957 primary · 87.9 efficiency · 20.8 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8244
W.T. White · Dallas, TX
- Committed To
- Baylor
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,334
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.